Founded in 2005 with an initial fleet of 11 vessels and a simple business model, Eagle has evolved into one of the world’s leading drybulk shipowner-operators.

In September 2015, the Company adopted a new ‘active management’ strategy for fleet employment with the objective of optimizing revenue performance and maximizing earnings on a risk-adjusted basis.

Through the execution of various commercial strategies employed across our global trading desks in the US, Europe, and Asia, Eagle has been able to achieve improved timecharter equivalent (or “TCE”) rates and outperform the relevant market index (Baltic Supramax Index) on a consistent basis.

Commercial strategies we employ include:

(listed in increasing order of sophistication)

1. Timecharter-out

The most basic method of employing a vessel, Timecharter-out involves leasing out a ship for an agreed period of time at a set USD per day rate.  The shipowner-operator essentially hands over commercial management to the charterer who performs the voyage(s).  The length of timecharters can range from as short as one voyage (approximately 20-40 days) to multiple years.

2. Voyage Chartering

This involves the employment of a vessel to carry cargo from one port to another based on a USD per ton rate.  In contrast to a Timecharter-out strategy, in a Voyage Charter, the shipowner-operator maintains control of the commercial operation and is responsible for managing the voyage, including vessel scheduling and routing, and for any related costs such as fuel, port expenses, etc.  Having the ability to control and manage the voyage, the shipowner-operator is able to generate increased margin through operational efficiencies, business intelligence and scale.  Additionally, contracting to carry cargoes on voyage terms often gives the shipowner-operator the ability to utilize a wide range of vessels to perform the contract (as long as the vessel meets the contractual parameters), thereby giving significant operational flexibility to the fleet.  Vessels used to perform this type of business may include not only ships owned by the company, but also third-party ships which can be timechartered-in on an opportunistic basis (the inverse of a Timecharter-out Strategy).

3. Vessel + Cargo Arbitrage

With this strategy, the shipowner-operator contracts to carry a cargo on voyage terms (as described in Voyage Chartering) with a specific ship earmarked to cover the commitment.  As the date of cargo loading approaches, the shipowner-operator may elect to substitute a different vessel to perform the voyage, while securing alternate employment for the ship that was initially earmarked for the voyage.  Taken as a whole, this strategy can generate increased revenues, on a risk-adjusted basis, as compared to the initial cargo commitment.

4. Timecharter-in

This strategy involves leasing a vessel from a third-party shipowner at a set USD per day rate.  As referenced above, vessels can be timechartered-in to cover existing cargo commitments, or to effect Vessel+Cargo Arbitrage.  These ships may be chartered-in for periods longer than required for the initial cargo or can be chartered-in opportunistically in order to benefit from rate dislocations and risk-managed exposure to the market overall.

5. Hedging (FFAs)

Forward Freight Agreements (“FFAs”) are cleared financial instruments, which can be used to hedge market rate exposure by locking in a fixed rate against the eventual forward market.  FFAs are an important tool to manage market risk associated with the time chartering-in of third party vessels.  FFAs can also be used to lock in revenue streams on owned vessels or against forward cargo commitments the company may have entered into.

6. Asymmetric Optionality

This is a blended strategy approach that uses a combination of timecharters, cargo commitments, and FFAs in order to hedge market exposure, while maintaining upside optionality to positive market volatility.  For example, in a scenario where a ship may be timechartered-in for one year with an option for an additional year, Eagle, dependent on market conditions, could sell an FFA for the firm 1-year period commitment (essentially eliminating exposure to the market), while maintaining full upside on rate developments for the optional year.